Sites about critically evaluating information retrieved on the Web.
More information
More information
Subcategories 1
Related categories 7
Sites 10
Questions to help explain why a particular source is a good fit for a research project.
Categorizes problematic sites and gives many examples of each type. Ends with a section which points to sites which give people accurate information as well as warnings about hoaxes and half-true stories.
An essay that considers peer review, author's credentials, writing style, and plausibility of information.
[PDF]
Guidelines for evaluating Internet sources, including a checklist to help assure credibility, accuracy, reasonableness, and supported claims.
Short page covering some basic points: Who is responsible? Is the URL appropriate? Who do they link to? Who links to them? Use common sense.
By Dr. T.Matthew Ciolek. Online resources relevant for evaluation, development and administration of high quality factual/scholarly networked information systems.
Checklist with "So What?" buttons to clarify why you'd want to have an answer to the various questions.
Looks at what teachers need consider before sharing a web site with students in their classrooms.
Part of the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab, their goal is to understand what leads people to believe what they find on the Web. With information, papers, and related links.
Created by a library media specialist, contains guides for rating the curriculum content and graphic design of web sites.
Questions to help explain why a particular source is a good fit for a research project.
Short page covering some basic points: Who is responsible? Is the URL appropriate? Who do they link to? Who links to them? Use common sense.
Checklist with "So What?" buttons to clarify why you'd want to have an answer to the various questions.
Created by a library media specialist, contains guides for rating the curriculum content and graphic design of web sites.
Looks at what teachers need consider before sharing a web site with students in their classrooms.
Categorizes problematic sites and gives many examples of each type. Ends with a section which points to sites which give people accurate information as well as warnings about hoaxes and half-true stories.
By Dr. T.Matthew Ciolek. Online resources relevant for evaluation, development and administration of high quality factual/scholarly networked information systems.
Part of the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab, their goal is to understand what leads people to believe what they find on the Web. With information, papers, and related links.
An essay that considers peer review, author's credentials, writing style, and plausibility of information.
[PDF]
Guidelines for evaluating Internet sources, including a checklist to help assure credibility, accuracy, reasonableness, and supported claims.
